- From: Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 10:08:04 -0400
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
Yes, it would need to return the new structure, otherwise the non-required members would be lost. I'm not sure that they should be called 'hints' my understanding is that the UA MUST apply them. If that's the case, they're constraints, but ones that give the UA more flexibility in ordering. - Jim On 4/2/2014 8:23 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote: > On 2014-04-02 13:48, Dan Burnett wrote: >> On Apr 2, 2014, at 2:06 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote: >> >>> Thanks a lot for working out this proposal! >>> >>> I like it. >>> >>> Just for confirmation: getCapabilities, getConstraints and >>> getSettings would work as today (no changes compared to the Ed's >>> draft)? >> getCapabilities and getSettings should be unchanged. I'll have to >> think about getConstraints, but off the top of my head it will either >> be able to remain the same or it will return this new structure. > It should probably return the new structure. > -- Jim Barnett Genesys
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2014 14:08:46 UTC