W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > April 2014

Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise

From: Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 10:08:04 -0400
Message-ID: <533C19C4.7030605@gmail.com>
To: public-media-capture@w3.org
Yes, it would need to return the new structure, otherwise the 
non-required members would be lost.  I'm not sure that they should be 
called 'hints' my understanding is that the UA MUST apply them. If 
that's the case, they're constraints, but ones that give the UA more 
flexibility in ordering.

- Jim
On 4/2/2014 8:23 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote:
> On 2014-04-02 13:48, Dan Burnett wrote:
>> On Apr 2, 2014, at 2:06 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote:
>>> Thanks a lot for working out this proposal!
>>> I like it.
>>> Just for confirmation: getCapabilities, getConstraints and
>>> getSettings would work as today (no changes compared to the Ed's
>>> draft)?
>> getCapabilities and getSettings should be unchanged.  I'll have to
>> think about getConstraints, but off the top of my head it will either
>> be able to remain the same or it will return this new structure.
> It should probably return the new structure.

Jim Barnett
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2014 14:08:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:25 UTC