Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise

"Preferred" seems to be good instead of advanced.


On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>wrote:

> On mar., 2014-04-01 at 21:17 -0400, Dan Burnett wrote:
> > At the teleconference last week we were tasked with finding a way to
> > adjust the current constraint syntax in the specification, without
> > loss of expressivity, into a syntax that was WebIDL-compatible.  We
> > may have done one better.
> >
> > We have found a workable compromise.
>
> Thanks guys, this look quite good!
>
> My only comment is similar to one that others have made: I think
> "advanced" is not very descriptive; I'm thinking maybe
> "preferredProfiles" or something like that might be clearer. But I don't
> feel strongly at all about it, and I'm happy to leave this to the
> editors discretion as far as I am concerned.
>
> Dom
>
>
>
>