gUM and persistent permissions

• From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
• Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 11:52:25 -0700
• To: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <CABkgnnWy8qfx8bxykhPevop1S6SZDc4yPnW9FRye-_GefRH5=A@mail.gmail.com>

We talked in the past about forbidding the persistence of permissions
for non-secure origins (e.g., http://example.com).

I know that we've talked about this on numerous occasions and we seem
to have had agreement, but I can't find any record of it in the spec.

Received on Monday, 28 April 2014 18:52:53 UTC