- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 04:15:25 +0000
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25360 Bug ID: 25360 Summary: MediaStreamTrack should not be considered as ended just because remote peer stopped sending data. Product: WebRTC Working Group Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Media Capture and Streams Assignee: public-media-capture@w3.org Reporter: kiran.guduru@samsung.com CC: public-media-capture@w3.org In section 10. Event Summary [1], non-normative section, it was specified for ended event that, ended event can be fired "because the remote peer stopped sending data". But there are chances for remote peer to temporarily stop sending data as below. When the user put remote peer on HOLD, the SDP will be negotiated with sendonly and recvonly in offer and answer respectively [2, 3]. In this scenario, remote peer will temporarily stop sending data until the time it is put to UNHOLD (offer, answer with sendrecv). So MediaStreamTrack should not be considered as ended just because remote peer stopped sending data. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/mediacapture-streams/#event-summary [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-sdp-04#page-19 [3] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3264#page-17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2014 04:15:28 UTC