- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 04:15:25 +0000
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25360
Bug ID: 25360
Summary: MediaStreamTrack should not be considered as ended
just because remote peer stopped sending data.
Product: WebRTC Working Group
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Media Capture and Streams
Assignee: public-media-capture@w3.org
Reporter: kiran.guduru@samsung.com
CC: public-media-capture@w3.org
In section 10. Event Summary [1], non-normative section, it was specified for
ended event that, ended event can be fired "because the remote peer stopped
sending data".
But there are chances for remote peer to temporarily stop sending data as
below.
When the user put remote peer on HOLD, the SDP will be negotiated with sendonly
and recvonly in offer and answer respectively [2, 3]. In this scenario, remote
peer will temporarily stop sending data until the time it is put to UNHOLD
(offer, answer with sendrecv).
So MediaStreamTrack should not be considered as ended just because remote peer
stopped sending data.
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/mediacapture-streams/#event-summary
[2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-sdp-04#page-19
[3] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3264#page-17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2014 04:15:28 UTC