public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from February 2017 by thread

WG issues by submitter Irene Polikoff (Monday, 27 February)

ISSUE-234: Started wiki page for response Holger Knublauch (Monday, 27 February)

shapes-ISSUE-234 (Peter 2017-02-22): Public comment https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/2017Feb/0165.html [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 27 February)

ISSUE-232: Wiki page to collect security & privacy ideas Holger Knublauch (Friday, 24 February)

ISSUE-233: Added section on sh:shapesGraphWellFormed Holger Knublauch (Wednesday, 22 February)

Created page on postponed features Holger Knublauch (Wednesday, 22 February)

horizontal review Sandro Hawke (Wednesday, 22 February)

ISSUE-222: status Irene Polikoff (Wednesday, 22 February)

number of individuals who have commented on SHACL Irene Polikoff (Wednesday, 22 February)

shapes-ISSUE-232 Security & Privacy Sections Sandro Hawke (Wednesday, 22 February)

WG meeting 2017-02-22 Holger Knublauch (Tuesday, 21 February)

shapes-ISSUE-233 (Shapes syntax checking): Should we require support for checking of well-formed shapes graphs? [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Tuesday, 21 February)

ISSUE-229: Draft response Holger Knublauch (Monday, 20 February)

ISSUE-228: Draft response Holger Knublauch (Monday, 20 February)

ISSUE-225: Draft response Holger Knublauch (Monday, 20 February)

shapes-ISSUE-232 (Privacy and Security): Respec suggests a section on privacy and security [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 15 February)

shapes-ACTION-48: Produce a json-ld @context draft RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 15 February)

shapes-ISSUE-231 (sh:message in components): Could we allow sh:message for constraint components, not just validators? [SHACL - SPARQL] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 15 February)

Re: wrong name for exactly one Ted Thibodeau Jr (Wednesday, 15 February)

WG meeting 2017-02-15 Holger Knublauch (Tuesday, 14 February)

shapes-ISSUE-230 ($this and $PATH in sh:sparql): Inconsistency in the use of $this and $PATH in sh:sparql vs constraint components [SHACL - SPARQL] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 10 February)

shapes-ISSUE-229 (results included in a validation report): Respond to the comment about what results to be included in a validation report [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 10 February)

shapes-ISSUE-228 (Form of the validation report): Respond to the comment about the form of the validation report [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 10 February)

shapes-ISSUE-227 (SPARQL-based constraint components using EXISTS): Behavior of SPARQL-based constraint components that use EXISTS [SHACL - SPARQL] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 9 February)

Compact Syntax? - Fwd: [RDF AP] Update on RDF validation at W3C Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 9 February)

shapes-ISSUE-226 (JSON-LD @context): Should the WG produce a JSON-LD @context RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 9 February)

Fwd: loss of functionality Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 9 February)

Fixed an incorrect IRI Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 9 February)

ISSUE-139: Some parameters now lead to ill-formed node shapes Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 9 February)

shapes-ISSUE-225 (Validation Report details): Respond to "Validation results and reports" [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 8 February)

declaring (practically) insensible shapes to be ill-formed Irene Polikoff (Tuesday, 7 February)

Added a JSON-LD example Holger Knublauch (Tuesday, 7 February)

WG Meeting 2017-02-08 Holger Knublauch (Tuesday, 7 February)

[pfpschneider@gmail.com: [Moderator Action] Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02] Eric Prud'hommeaux (Monday, 6 February)

Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Irene Polikoff (Monday, 6 February)

shapes-ISSUE-224 (Improved shape type definitions): Can we improve the language around the use of rdf:types for shapes [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Sunday, 5 February)

shapes-ISSUE-223 (Shapes mismatching type): Should we disallow shapes with mismatching type [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Sunday, 5 February)

shapes-ISSUE-222 (Pre-binding 2): Response to "On pre-binding" [SHACL - SPARQL] Irene Polikoff (Saturday, 4 February)

Re: WG Meeting 2017-02-01 Simon Steyskal (Wednesday, 1 February)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-221 (sh:Shape hierarchy): Simplify the class hierarchy of shapes [SHACL - Core] Dimitris Kontokostas (Wednesday, 1 February)

Early draft: SHACL-JS JavaScript extensions Holger Knublauch (Wednesday, 1 February)

Last message date: Monday, 27 February 2017 23:56:34 UTC