- From: RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2017 06:12:33 +0000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
shapes-ISSUE-223 (Shapes mismatching type): Should we disallow shapes with mismatching type [SHACL - Core] http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/223 Raised by: Holger Knublauch On product: SHACL - Core See https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/2017Feb/0001.html it was pointed out that cases like ex:s1 rdf:type sh:NodeShape ; sh:targetClass ex:Person ; sh:path ex:child ; sh:nodeKind sh:IRI . can be confusing to users because it's really a property shape despite having sh:NodeShape as type. While this is an artificially constructed example, a reasonable addition would be to add two syntax rules: a) SHACL instances of sh:NodeShape cannot have values for sh:path b) SHACL instances of sh:PropertyShape must have a value for sh:path making such cases ill-formed shapes.
Received on Sunday, 5 February 2017 06:12:40 UTC