shapes-ISSUE-226 (JSON-LD @context): Should the WG produce a JSON-LD @context from RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker on 2017-02-09 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from February 2017)

From: RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 01:14:35 +0000
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1cbdJj-000FmF-Dg@maia.w3.org>

shapes-ISSUE-226 (JSON-LD @context): Should the WG produce a JSON-LD @context

http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/226

Raised by: Holger Knublauch
On product: 

(This is entirely optional and not to hold off any W3C process)

See https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2017Feb/0010.html there will likely be some value for the adoption of SHACL if there was a de-facto standard ("recommended") JSON-LD serialization context, possibly with framing.

This ticket is to organize the discussion around this topic.

Received on Thursday, 9 February 2017 01:14:42 UTC