- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 16:20:51 +1000
- To: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
I have started a (long) wiki page to prepare the WG response to Peter's latest list of comments: https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/ISSUE-234 IMHO most issues were quite easy to address, many did not require changes at all, some were essentially a matter of taste, others were already discussed. So although he had indeed found some more glitches I very much disagree with Peter's assessment that substantial changes are required. In fact I believe this commit addresses most of the things that he reported: https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/28f40d46efe714ebe9f1909f82e3fd84172dc447 I would like to discuss this on Wednesday and would appreciate input on topics 36 and 37. Also, I would appreciate a review of my changes to the textual definitions of sh:not, sh:and, sh:or, sh:xone, sh:node and sh:qualifiedValueShape, which have been switched to use "conformance" instead of "validation results". This helps avoid some of the complications related to producing nested values as it makes it clearer that implementers are not forced to produce nested values at all. Thanks, Holger
Received on Monday, 27 February 2017 06:51:13 UTC