- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 11:22:29 +1000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Pano, > I can create an @context. thanks for offering to look into a possible JSON-LD @context. As a start we could set up a file with a couple of frequently used properties. > > However, do note that one would still need to frame their JSON-LD to get the desired output. > We could probably create a default frame for a "pure" shapes graph, but if the shapes graph contains > other non-shacl instances the frame should be customized to their needs. In terms of framing, I believe the main rule should be that bnodes should always be nested, in particular nested sh:property and sh:node values. I do not know JSON-LD enough to understand the problems of how such frames would interact with other people's, but I believe it would go a long way if we had framing for pure SHACL files at least. Many people will separate their schema definitions from their instance data. With this, I'd need to play the ball into your court and leave it up to you whether and when to make progress on this (I am a bit overloaded with other things right now but would be happy to test it, can put it on GitHub etc). Holger > > Kind regards, > Pano
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2017 01:23:06 UTC