public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from July 2016 by subject

$variables

abstract syntax for SHACL

Categorization of constraint components

Fwd: Re: Improving EXISTS

ISSUE-132: Can be closed

ISSUE-133: Wiki page with syntax examples

ISSUE-139: Compromise

ISSUE-150: nested severities

ISSUE-166: Suggestion to close without action

ISSUE-41: Progress

ISSUE-65 and ISSUE-111: Could IMHO be closed

List of open SHACL Core Syntax ISSUEs

Proposal to close ISSUE-134 (Does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints)_

question on sh:NodeConstraint

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 14 July 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 21 July 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 27 July 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 7 July 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 14 July 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 21 July 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 28 July 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 30 June 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 7 July 2016

shapes-ISSUE-158 (ill-typed literals and sh:datatype): ill-typed literals do not always trigger a validation result [SHACL - Core]

shapes-ISSUE-171 (negated sh:classIn): sh:classIn SPARQL definition incorrect [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-172 (sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition): the sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition is unnecessarily complex [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-173 (Hiding SPARQL): [Editorial] Text related to SPARQL definitions needs to be hidden together with query [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-174 (Scopenode): Scopenode does not use RDF node definition [SHACL - Core]

shapes-ISSUE-175 (scope naming): Alternate naming for term for scope / in-scope [SHACL - Core]

Updates to Abstract Syntax

Last message date: Friday, 29 July 2016 16:31:37 UTC