- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 09:12:28 +1000
- To: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
The proposal in ISSUE-166 is to split the spec into two documents - factoring out the advanced parts. We have discussed this at length many times and my view point has not changed. There are lots of benefits of having a single consistent document with the ability to cross-link between sections (e.g. the SPARQL definitions of the core constraint components require details that would otherwise have to be duplicated from the advanced sections). Anyone who is only interested in the Core language can stop reading after the first part. PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-166 without action. Holger
Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2016 23:12:59 UTC