- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:42:28 +1000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
The Abstract Syntax lags behind the path-vs-inverse property stuff. I also believe we have decided to use the term shapes graph instead of "schema", so this should be aligned. In terms of the current resolutions, I believe the spec is up to date. We are waiting for resolutions on ISSUE-133 (tomorrow) and then scope syntax. Meanwhile I believe it might be easier to track the spec with a single BNF-like document instead of having snippets of the syntax interwoven with prose. Otherwise you are probably wasting a lot of time tracking another changing document. Holger On 28/07/2016 1:42, Karen Coyle wrote: > Eric and I have made the requested updates to the Abstract Syntax > document:[1] > - made clear that this is based on SHACL and is non-normative > - added references (refresh, refresh, refresh until you see them) > > We need to coordinate this with SHACL, but I admit to being unclear > what changes are "in progress" there, so perhaps Holger and Dimitris > could give us an update on where they are with changes. For example, > scopeNode is still listed in the editor's draft - will it be removed > before the next working draft is issued? etc. Maybe what we need is > what will be in/out for that next draft? > > Thanks, > kc & ericP > > [1] http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl-abstract-syntax/
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2016 23:43:02 UTC