- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 05:31:22 -0400
- To: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Cc: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
* Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> [2016-07-27 19:27-0700] > > > On 7/27/16 4:42 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > >The Abstract Syntax lags behind the path-vs-inverse property stuff. > > > >I also believe we have decided to use the term shapes graph instead of > >"schema", so this should be aligned. > > > >In terms of the current resolutions, I believe the spec is up to date. > >We are waiting for resolutions on ISSUE-133 (tomorrow) and then scope > >syntax. > > > >Meanwhile I believe it might be easier to track the spec with a single > >BNF-like document instead of having snippets of the syntax interwoven > >with prose. Otherwise you are probably wasting a lot of time tracking > >another changing document. > > I disagree. Readability is very important. - kc I added a button and key action ('a') to strip to the AS. > > > >Holger > > > > > >On 28/07/2016 1:42, Karen Coyle wrote: > >>Eric and I have made the requested updates to the Abstract Syntax > >>document:[1] > >> - made clear that this is based on SHACL and is non-normative > >> - added references (refresh, refresh, refresh until you see them) > >> > >>We need to coordinate this with SHACL, but I admit to being unclear > >>what changes are "in progress" there, so perhaps Holger and Dimitris > >>could give us an update on where they are with changes. For example, > >>scopeNode is still listed in the editor's draft - will it be removed > >>before the next working draft is issued? etc. Maybe what we need is > >>what will be in/out for that next draft? > >> > >>Thanks, > >>kc & ericP > >> > >>[1] http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl-abstract-syntax/ > > > > > > > > -- > Karen Coyle > kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net > m: 1-510-435-8234 > skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600 > -- -ericP office: +1.617.599.3509 mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59 (eric@w3.org) Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than email address distribution. There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.
Received on Thursday, 28 July 2016 09:31:30 UTC