- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 17:32:41 -0700
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
The extension mechanism should be separate from the core because there is no one extension mechanism required - we have agreed that one can extend using SPARQL but one can also extend using other technologies. The inter-dependency of the core on the extension is therefore not only not required but would violate the design requirements. kc On 7/6/16 4:12 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > The proposal in ISSUE-166 is to split the spec into two documents - > factoring out the advanced parts. We have discussed this at length many > times and my view point has not changed. There are lots of benefits of > having a single consistent document with the ability to cross-link > between sections (e.g. the SPARQL definitions of the core constraint > components require details that would otherwise have to be duplicated > from the advanced sections). Anyone who is only interested in the Core > language can stop reading after the first part. > > PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-166 without action. > > Holger > > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Thursday, 7 July 2016 00:33:18 UTC