- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:26:15 +1000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2016 23:26:47 UTC
Agenda looks good to me. It would be awesome if we could finally close the syntax issue 133. In case we decide to merge sh:Shape and sh:NodeConstraint then we can also close ISSUE-135. Furthermore I believe we should then also delete sh:classIn/sh:datatypeIn because the sh:or syntax will be sufficiently pretty and we could uniformly handle mixed ranges, closing ISSUE-141. That would be a great simplification. The only remaining syntax issues would then be about the naming of some properties, such as the scope (or not). Holger On 28/07/2016 8:52, Arnaud Le Hors wrote: > Hi, > Here is the agenda for this week's call. If there is anything else we > should talk about, please, let me know. > Thanks. > https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2016.07.28 > -- > Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies > - IBM Cloud >
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2016 23:26:47 UTC