W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > May 2017

Re: [csswg-drafts] reconsider name of frames() timing function

From: shans via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 07:12:45 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-298838157-1493795563-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

Firefox and Chrome have already shipped the frame() timing function. I'm sympathetic to the reasons for the change of name but I'm not keen on both those browsers having to maintain legacy aliasing support.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by shans
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1301#issuecomment-298838157 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 3 May 2017 07:12:51 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Florian Rivoal via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-multicol] allow percentages for `column-gap`"
Previous message: Rachel Andrew via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-align][css-flexbox][css-grid] Difference between overflow behaviour when aligning and justifying to start and end in flexbox and grid"
In reply to: [ message archived in another list or period ]
Next in thread: Brian Birtles via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] reconsider name of frames() timing function"
Maybe reply: Brian Birtles via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] reconsider name of frames() timing function"
Maybe reply: Martin : "Re: [csswg-drafts] reconsider name of frames() timing function"
Maybe reply: Rachel Nabors via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] reconsider name of frames() timing function"
Maybe reply: Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] reconsider name of frames() timing function"
Maybe reply: Brian Birtles via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] reconsider name of frames() timing function"
Maybe reply: Rachel Nabors via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] reconsider name of frames() timing function"
Maybe reply: Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] reconsider name of frames() timing function"
Maybe reply: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] reconsider name of frames() timing function"
Maybe reply: Brian Birtles via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] reconsider name of frames() timing function"
Maybe reply: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] reconsider name of frames() timing function"
Maybe reply: Brian Birtles via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] reconsider name of frames() timing function"
Maybe reply: Rachel Nabors via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] reconsider name of frames() timing function"
Maybe reply: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] reconsider name of frames() timing function"
Maybe reply: Simon Fraser via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] reconsider name of frames() timing function"
Maybe reply: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] reconsider name of frames() timing function"
Maybe reply: Rachel Nabors via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] reconsider name of frames() timing function"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 10:12:53 UTC