W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > May 2017

Re: [csswg-drafts] reconsider name of frames() timing function

From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 06 May 2017 18:25:31 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-299656566-1494093943-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Rachel's tweet, if anyone wants to re-tweet for wider reach:

> [CSS animations folks, if we could call steps() something else, what would you suggest?](https://twitter.com/rachelnabors/status/860866482326171649)

She carefully *didn't* use the word `frames` in her question. Yet 3 of 4 replies right now are recommending it.

GitHub Notification of comment by AmeliaBR
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1301#issuecomment-299656566 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 6 May 2017 18:25:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:12 UTC