- From: Simon Fraser via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 16:58:10 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I don't strongly object to frames(), but it seems like a variant of `steps()`, so maybe it should `steps(n, <something>).` Maybe `<something>` is a word that implies "inclusive"? -- GitHub Notification of comment by smfr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1301#issuecomment-300546313 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 10 May 2017 16:58:16 UTC