W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > May 2017

Re: [csswg-drafts] reconsider name of frames() timing function

From: Simon Fraser via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 16:58:10 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-300546313-1494435489-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I don't strongly object to frames(), but it seems like a variant of `steps()`, so maybe it should `steps(n, <something>).` Maybe `<something>` is a word that implies "inclusive"?



-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by smfr
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1301#issuecomment-300546313 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 10 May 2017 16:58:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:12 UTC