Re: [csswg-drafts] reconsider name of frames() timing function from CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub on 2017-05-10 (public-css-archive@w3.org from May 2017)

From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 16:54:48 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-300545458-1494435287-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

The CSS Working Group just discussed `reconsider name of frames() timing function`.

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic:  reconsider name of frames() timing function<br>
&lt;dael> Github topic: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1301<br>
&lt;Bert> (Konqueror 4.14 (current) and Opera 12 (old) treat the test case as per the spec. How much content is still out there thatr was made wih Mac OS 9?)<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: Long issue, added by dbaron. Has some ML discussion.<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: I feel like github is having fruitful discussion<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1301#issuecomment-300545458 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 10 May 2017 16:54:54 UTC