- From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 01:51:13 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
What about `steps(2, equal)` ? I think "two equal steps" is a fairly easy-to-understand description of what this timing function achieves. It doesn't help clarify how its different from `steps(2, start)`, though. Maybe `steps(2, full)` ? But, my vote is still on keeping `frames()`, especially since it has already shipped! That helps avoid confusion between the different ways of counting: `steps()` counts the number of times the value _changes_, `frames()` counts the number of different values. The terminology could be reinforced with a new figure in the spec, showing the keyframes, the frames, and the steps as different parts of the timing function graph. -- GitHub Notification of comment by AmeliaBR Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1301#issuecomment-299753967 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 8 May 2017 01:51:19 UTC