Re: [csswg-drafts] reconsider name of frames() timing function

I like adding onto the `steps()` syntax, personally. Use what is already there.

(Although, `steps()` is still a horrible name for the timing function! Explaining it to students always elicits confusion. `jumps()` may have made more sense, but alas. The dye is cast!)

In that light, "even" might not make sense to folks who may not even fully understand `start` and `end`.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by rachelnabors
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1301#issuecomment-299749586 using your GitHub account