public-bioschemas@w3.org from September 2017 by author

Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran

• Re: Multiple types (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: Multiple types (Thursday, 14 September)

Dan Bolser

• Re: Right way to propose changes to the current schema? (Tuesday, 12 September)

Dan Brickley

• Re: Why is PhysicalThing.additionalType recommended rather than mandatory (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: Multiple types (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: Bioschema specifications repo (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: Right way to propose changes to the current schema? (Tuesday, 12 September)

Dominique Batista

• Re: Preferred ontology for PhysicalEntity.additionalType? (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: Bioschema specifications repo (Wednesday, 13 September)

Gray, Alasdair J G

• Governance proceedures (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: Why is PhysicalThing.additionalType recommended rather than mandatory (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: Why is PhysicalThing.additionalType recommended rather than mandatory (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: Bioschema specifications repo (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: Public folder for public presentations and posters (Monday, 11 September)

Justin Clark-Casey

• Re: Why is PhysicalThing.additionalType recommended rather than mandatory (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Why is PhysicalThing.additionalType recommended rather than mandatory (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Preferred ontology for PhysicalEntity.additionalType? (Tuesday, 19 September)

Leyla Garcia

• Fundamental changes on Bioschemas specifications for Life Sciences entities (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: Why is PhysicalThing.additionalType recommended rather than mandatory (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: Why is PhysicalThing.additionalType recommended rather than mandatory (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: Preferred ontology for PhysicalEntity.additionalType? (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: Why is PhysicalThing.additionalType recommended rather than mandatory (Tuesday, 19 September)

ljgarcia

• Re: Multiple types (Friday, 15 September)
• Bioschema specifications (Thursday, 14 September)
• Multiple types (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: Bioschema specifications repo (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: Right way to propose changes to the current schema? (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Right way to propose changes to the current schema? (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: Public folder for public presentations and posters (Monday, 11 September)
• Public folder for public presentations and posters (Sunday, 10 September)

Michel Dumontier

• Re: Fundamental changes on Bioschemas specifications for Life Sciences entities (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: Why is PhysicalThing.additionalType recommended rather than mandatory (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: Why is PhysicalThing.additionalType recommended rather than mandatory (Tuesday, 19 September)

Rafael C. Jimenez

• Bioschemas adoption meeting - Oct 2-3 (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: Bioschema specifications repo (Wednesday, 13 September)

Susheel Varma

• Re: Bioschema specifications repo (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: Bioschema specifications repo (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: Right way to propose changes to the current schema? (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Bioschema specifications repo (Tuesday, 12 September)

Last message date: Thursday, 28 September 2017 08:16:49 UTC