- From: Justin Clark-Casey <justinccdev@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 12:35:04 +0100
- To: public-bioschemas@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 19 September 2017 11:35:27 UTC
I see that PhysicalThing.additionalType is shown as recommended [1] whereas BiologicalEntity.biologicalType [2] was mandatory. What is the reason for this change? I thought that this was one for the most critical properties (since most entity types will not have their own Bioschemas subclass). [1] http://bioschemas.org/bsc_specs/PhysicalEntity/specification/ [2] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XASuESIHU3bi1aXMxQS5-rCOQX0ugjMNkh68VF4co4Q -- Justin
Received on Tuesday, 19 September 2017 11:35:27 UTC