W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bioschemas@w3.org > September 2017

Re: Bioschema specifications repo

From: Susheel Varma <susheel.varma@elixir-europe.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:51:07 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPSR=Pk9Pje15mS5EMgXOQUZas6=3WNMiWe01ELixiShMt-+QQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: ljgarcia <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk>
Cc: public-bioschemas@w3.org
Just to highjack Leyla's example below: All these multiple changes need to
be part of single pull request into a single repo targeting PhyscialEntity,
LabProtocol and Record entities together.

ยง Susheel

On 13 September 2017 at 13:37, ljgarcia <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk> wrote:

> Hi all,
> Please find attached the current overview for Bioschemas entities.
> Main changes:
> * PhysicalEntity and Record replace BiologicalEntity so the actual
> instance and the record are kept separated.
> * PhysicalEntity acts as a wrapper, the intended type is modelled with
> additonalType from the type Thing. It should point to an ontological type,
> for instance http://semanticscience.org/resource/SIO_010043 for a protein.
> * additionalType can be used as well in Record; for instance
> http://purl.uniprot.org/core/Protein for a UniProt protein record.
> * LabProtocol has been updated accordingly
> * There could some further discussion regarding the structuralElement
> proposed for CreativeWork as it could be of general interest.
> We are now working on the specification documents and some examples as
> well.
> Regards,
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2017 12:52:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:07:59 UTC