- From: Susheel Varma <susheel.varma@elixir-europe.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:51:07 +0100
- To: ljgarcia <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-bioschemas@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2017 12:52:03 UTC
Just to highjack Leyla's example below: All these multiple changes need to be part of single pull request into a single repo targeting PhyscialEntity, LabProtocol and Record entities together. ยง Susheel On 13 September 2017 at 13:37, ljgarcia <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi all, > > Please find attached the current overview for Bioschemas entities. > > Main changes: > * PhysicalEntity and Record replace BiologicalEntity so the actual > instance and the record are kept separated. > * PhysicalEntity acts as a wrapper, the intended type is modelled with > additonalType from the type Thing. It should point to an ontological type, > for instance http://semanticscience.org/resource/SIO_010043 for a protein. > * additionalType can be used as well in Record; for instance > http://purl.uniprot.org/core/Protein for a UniProt protein record. > * LabProtocol has been updated accordingly > * There could some further discussion regarding the structuralElement > proposed for CreativeWork as it could be of general interest. > > We are now working on the specification documents and some examples as > well. > > Regards, >
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2017 12:52:03 UTC