Re: Right way to propose changes to the current schema?

Hi,

Leyla - Are you suggesting to move schema.org CreativeWork
<http://schema.org/CreativeWork> properties (hasPart
<http://schema.org/hasPart>, isPartOf <http://schema.org/isPartOf>) to its
more generic parent Thing <http://schema.org/Thing>? Any particular reason
why?

Best wishes
§ Susheel

On 12 September 2017 at 15:09, Dan Bolser <dan.bolser@gmail.com> wrote:

> I would suggest making a pull request against
> https://github.com/BioSchemas and initiating the discussion (which I
> think you just did ;-)
>
> Not sure which repo to edit.
>
> Can you motivate the changes?
>
> On 12 September 2017 at 06:14, ljgarcia <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> We would like to propose moving hasPart/isPartOf from CreativeWork to
>> Thing. We would also like to propose a reverse property for isBasedOn (it
>> would be isBasisFor) that would go to CreativeWork.
>>
>> What would be the right way to do so? Should we include a schema for
>> Thing and CreativeWork including those changes? And they, if approved,
>> would be later merged?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>