- From: Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran <alejandra.gonzalezbeltran@oerc.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 12:40:49 +0100
- To: public-bioschemas@w3.org
Hi Leyla, The multiple types issues is not about the vocabulary, but of the languages you will be using to represent the metadata. Where you asking if the Google Structured Data tool supports the multiple types? It seems that http://schema.org/additionalType is a property that allows you to specify another type for an entity, as per the examples in that page (see microdata, JSON-LD), but as I understand it, it is only to be used for adding types from a different vocabulary in microdata (and probably this generated the need of this property?). Note that JSON-LD supports multiple types (see seccion 5.4 in the spec https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/) Microdata also supports multiple types as long as they are from the same vocabulary: https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-microdata-20131029/#attr-itemtype And in RDFa you can use 'typeof' for multiple types. Hope this helps, Alejandra On 14/09/2017 12:23, ljgarcia wrote: > Hello, > > Does anyone know whether schema.org. supports multiple types? From > http://schema.org/additionalType I seems like it does. > > I want to know if I can have an element with types StructuredValue and > MedicalCondition at the same time... so I can use properties from both > of them. > > Regards, >
Received on Thursday, 14 September 2017 11:41:37 UTC