Right way to propose changes to the current schema? from ljgarcia on 2017-09-12 (public-bioschemas@w3.org from September 2017)

From: ljgarcia <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 06:14:15 +0100
To: public-bioschemas@w3.org
Message-ID: <ba59701eeed9d768f477bc3153f31e90@ebi.ac.uk>

Hi Dan,

We would like to propose moving hasPart/isPartOf from CreativeWork to 
Thing. We would also like to propose a reverse property for isBasedOn 
(it would be isBasisFor) that would go to CreativeWork.

What would be the right way to do so? Should we include a schema for 
Thing and CreativeWork including those changes? And they, if approved, 
would be later merged?

Regards,

Received on Tuesday, 12 September 2017 05:14:39 UTC