- From: Dan Bolser <dan.bolser@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 15:09:45 +0100
- To: ljgarcia <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-bioschemas@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 12 September 2017 14:10:39 UTC
I would suggest making a pull request against https://github.com/BioSchemas and initiating the discussion (which I think you just did ;-) Not sure which repo to edit. Can you motivate the changes? On 12 September 2017 at 06:14, ljgarcia <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > We would like to propose moving hasPart/isPartOf from CreativeWork to > Thing. We would also like to propose a reverse property for isBasedOn (it > would be isBasisFor) that would go to CreativeWork. > > What would be the right way to do so? Should we include a schema for Thing > and CreativeWork including those changes? And they, if approved, would be > later merged? > > Regards, > >
Received on Tuesday, 12 September 2017 14:10:39 UTC