public-appformats@w3.org from April 2008 by subject

[fwd] [MacOS X] Insecure eval() in Twitgit and Twitterlex dashboard widgets (from: tlr@w3.org)

[widgets-digsig] Comment on use of X.509 v3

[widgets-digsig] Request for approval of FPWD and comments

[widgets-land] Request for approval of FPWD and comments

[widgets-reqs] Request for review for 14th of April

[widgets] Authorative reference to CP437

[Widgets] confi.xml - icon element

[widgets] Default icon proposal

[widgets] Digital Signatures

[widgets] i18n

[widgets] Minutes from 3 April 2008 Widgets Voice Conference

[Widgets] platform attribute for versioning

[widgets] Request for review for 14th of April

[widgets] Spec updates

[Widgets] Widget DigSig request for comments

[widgets] Widgets now on twitter

[XMLHttpRequest2] response headers for cross-site requests

Access Control Open Issues

CFP: Mashups'08 @ ICSOC

Cross-domain access in Silverlight 2 Beta 1

Cross-Site XHR Detection

IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests

Initial input for discussion of Widget security model

ISSUE-23 (widget-localization): What is the localization model for widgets? [Widgets]

Moving the AC4CSR spec forward [Was: Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-a-vis W3C?]

Please, let's stick to Technical Discussions!

Springer Book on Emergent Web Intelligence: Extended Submission Deadline ...

Update to Access Control for Cross-site Requests

What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site =?ISO-8859-1?Q? Requests]?=

What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]

Widgets 1.0: Digital Signature, FPWD comments

XDR *API* Security Impact

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 April 2008 17:06:41 UTC