- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:00:44 -0700
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Sunava Dutta <sunavad@windows.microsoft.com>, "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>, "public-appformats@w3.org" <public-appformats@w3.org>, Eric Lawrence <ericlaw@exchange.microsoft.com>, Zhenbin Xu <zhenbinx@windows.microsoft.com>, Gideon Cohn <gidco@windows.microsoft.com>, Sharath Udupa <Sharath.Udupa@microsoft.com>, Doug Stamper <dstamper@exchange.microsoft.com>, Marc Silbey <marcsil@windows.microsoft.com>
On Apr 29, 2008, at 2:14 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Chris Wilson wrote: >> >> Given the multitude of issues raised, and the obvious back-and-forth >> that denotes many differing opinions, I'd suggest having a telecom to >> discuss these questions, and make sure that Sunava, Eric and myself >> can >> attend. > > I'm with Anne on this. Please reply to the e-mails before convening a > telecon. It is very difficult to carefully consider feedback in the > context of a telecon. > > The problem isn't "back-and-forth" denoting "many differing > opinions", the > problem is that we don't know what Microsoft's opinion _is_. > > Telecons are by their nature much less open, and minutes are almost > uniformly so poor that it is hard to impossible to get precise > technical > details out of telecons. A telecon would not be appropriate at this > point. I would also prefer to see a clear statement of Microsoft's position in written form ahead of the telecon. By their nature, these are issues that need careful analysis, and cannot be evaluated fully in the context of a teleconference. Regards, Maciej
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2008 00:01:28 UTC