- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 10:51:43 +1000
- To: "David Håsäther" <hasather@gmail.com>
- Cc: "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
> > Yes, I think it's a good idea. Defaults are good. > Maybe there should also be a default index file (what's now specified in > the content element). Like "index.html" and "text/html". (I don't know why > this was removed, I seem to remember that they were there in earlier > versions of the spec.) The reason we removed it was because the <content> element became mandatory (so it made having a default superfluous). I'm happy to again make the <content> element optional (and hence, the whole config.xml document optional), but it will mean some significant changes to the current spec which I won't get time to do this week to meet the publication deadline. > On a slightly related note, maybe the name element should be obligatory, so > that widgets don't end up without a name. I'm reluctant to add more draconian error handling into the spec. Personally, I want to bring back the automated selection of index.html and make the config.xml file optional. We should add this to the agenda for the F2F. Kind regards, Marcos -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2008 00:59:06 UTC