- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 10:03:49 +1000
- To: "Hal Lockhart" <hlockhar@bea.com>
- Cc: olli.immonen@nokia.com, public-appformats@w3.org, member-xmlsec-maintwg-request@w3.org
> Since this is not well understood and the document is not generally > accessible, you might want to repeat the above in your document. In > fact, I would suggest changing it to say: > > Implementations MUST be prepared to accept any version certificate. The spec now reads: "Implementations must be prepared to accept all X.509 certificates versions identified in [X509v3] via the version field. To be clear, the value of the version field identifies the version of an X.509 certificate in the following way: 0 is X.509 version 1, 1 is X.509 version 2, 2 is X.509 version 3, if the version field is omitted, then treat the certificate as X.509 version 1." Please let me know if that is clear enough. Kind regards, Marcos -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Thursday, 3 April 2008 00:04:29 UTC