- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 11:23:33 +0200
- To: olli.immonen@nokia.com
- Cc: hlockhar@bea.com, marcosscaceres@gmail.com, public-appformats@w3.org, member-xmlsec-maintwg-request@w3.org
On 2008-04-02 10:32:39 +0300, olli.immonen@nokia.com wrote: > RFC3280 (a profile of X.509) states a bit more exactly which version > numbers to use: ... > So, stating conformance to [X509v3] does not imply that that only v3 > would be allowed. Thanks for clarifying this. A related question: Is there any reason to ask for conformance to X509v3 directly, as opposed to asking for conformance with RFC 3280? -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 09:24:05 UTC