xml-dist-app@w3.org from March 2003 by author

Amelia A. Lewis

• Re: Proposed Infoset Addendum to SOAP Messages with Attachments (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Proposed Infoset Addendum to SOAP Messages with Attachments (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Proposed Infoset Addendum to SOAP Messages with Attachments (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Monday, 10 March)

Anne Thomas Manes

• RE: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Friday, 7 March)

Champion, Mike

• RE: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Tuesday, 11 March)
• RE: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Tuesday, 11 March)
• RE: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Tuesday, 11 March)

Christopher B Ferris

• RE: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: WSDL 1.2 drops use="encoded" (Tuesday, 11 March)

Dan Brickley

• Re: WSDL 1.2 drops use="encoded" (Friday, 7 March)

David Fallside

• fyi: SOAP Version 1.2 Message Normalization (Friday, 28 March)

David Orchard

• RE: Proposed Infoset Addendum to SOAP Messages with Attachments (Wednesday, 26 March)
• RE: Proposed Infoset Addendum to SOAP Messages with Attachments (Wednesday, 26 March)

Don Box

• RE: Proposed Infoset Addendum to SOAP Messages with Attachments (Friday, 28 March)
• RE: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Tuesday, 11 March)
• RE: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Tuesday, 11 March)
• RE: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Monday, 10 March)
• RE: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Sunday, 9 March)
• RE: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Saturday, 8 March)
• RE: IBM CICS rejects REST :-) :-) (Friday, 7 March)
• IBM CICS rejects REST :-) :-) (Wednesday, 5 March)
• RE: WSDL 1.2 drops use="encoded" (Wednesday, 5 March)
• RE: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Saturday, 1 March)
• RE: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Saturday, 1 March)

Elliotte Rusty Harold

• Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Tuesday, 11 March)

Eugene Kuznetsov

• RE: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Tuesday, 11 March)
• RE: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Tuesday, 11 March)
• RE: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Monday, 10 March)
• RE: IBM CICS rejects REST :-) :-) (Wednesday, 5 March)

Glen Daniels

• RE: Proposal for spec changes for "action" feature. (Monday, 31 March)
• Proposal for spec changes for "action" feature. (Monday, 31 March)
• RE: Request for information: nodeType in SOAP 1.2 Implementations (Monday, 24 March)
• ISSUE : SOAPAction as Property? (Thursday, 20 March)

Herve Ruellan

• Re: Proposed Infoset Addendum to SOAP Messages with Attachments (Friday, 28 March)

Jacek Kopecky

• Re: Request for information: nodeType in SOAP 1.2 Implementations (Monday, 10 March)
• RPC body spec slightly unclear? (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: WSDL 1.2 drops use="encoded" (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: WSDL 1.2 drops use="encoded" (Friday, 7 March)

Jesus M. Salvo Jr.

• Re: Updates to SOAP 1.1 envelope and encoding schemas (Sunday, 16 March)

Joe Baysdon

• RE: Request for information: nodeType in SOAP 1.2 Implementations (Tuesday, 11 March)

John J. Barton

• Re: Proposed Infoset Addendum to SOAP Messages with Attachments (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Proposed Infoset Addendum to SOAP Messages with Attachments (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Proposed Infoset Addendum to SOAP Messages with Attachments (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Proposed Infoset Addendum to SOAP Messages with Attachments (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Tuesday, 11 March)
• RE: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Tuesday, 11 March)
• RE: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Monday, 10 March)
• RE: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Friday, 7 March)

Ken_Gross@Countrywide.Com

• RE: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: XMLSpy-SOAP/WSDL editing issues (Friday, 28 March)
• XMLSpy-SOAP/WSDL question (Thursday, 27 March)

Kurt Cagle

• Re: IBM CICS rejects REST :-) :-) (Wednesday, 5 March)

Laird A Popkin

• RE: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Tuesday, 11 March)

Liu, Hong

• "relay" Attribute in SOAP Envelope Schema (Tuesday, 4 March)

Marc Hadley

• Re: Proposed Infoset Addendum to SOAP Messages with Attachments (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: Proposed Infoset Addendum to SOAP Messages with Attachments (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: WSDL 1.2 drops use="encoded" (Wednesday, 5 March)

Mark Baker

• RE: Proposal for spec changes for "action" feature. (Monday, 31 March)

Mark Jones

• rewording of R21 and R31 (action item) (Wednesday, 26 March)

Martin Gudgin

• RE: Proposed Infoset Addendum to SOAP Messages with Attachments (Friday, 28 March)
• RE: Are empty strings legal xs:anyURI (Thursday, 27 March)
• Are empty strings legal xs:anyURI (Thursday, 27 March)
• RE: Proposed Infoset Addendum to SOAP Messages with Attachments (Wednesday, 26 March)
• RE: Proposed Infoset Addendum to SOAP Messages with Attachments (Wednesday, 26 March)
• RE: Proposed Infoset Addendum to SOAP Messages with Attachments (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Proposed Infoset Addendum to SOAP Messages with Attachments (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Updates to SOAP 1.1 envelope and encoding schemas (Friday, 14 March)
• RE: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Request for information: nodeType in SOAP 1.2 Implementations (Friday, 7 March)
• RE: Null return values from rpc calls (Thursday, 6 March)

Nilo Mitra (EUS)

• RE: Precise status of primer? (Tuesday, 25 March)

Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM

• Streaming and Well-Formedness (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: "relay" Attribute in SOAP Envelope Schema (Tuesday, 4 March)
• RE: WSDL 1.2 drops use="encoded" (Tuesday, 4 March)

Paul Kulchenko

• Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Sunday, 2 March)

Prasad Yendluri

• Re: Proposed Infoset Addendum to SOAP Messages with Attachments (Thursday, 27 March)

Ray Whitmer

• Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP (Tuesday, 4 March)

Rich Salz

• Re: Proposed Infoset Addendum to SOAP Messages with Attachments (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Proposed Infoset Addendum to SOAP Messages with Attachments (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: WSDL 1.2 drops use="encoded" (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: WSDL 1.2 drops use="encoded" (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: WSDL 1.2 drops use="encoded" (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: WSDL 1.2 drops use="encoded" (Monday, 3 March)

Robert van Engelen

• Re: WSDL 1.2 drops use="encoded" (Friday, 7 March)

Sanjiva Weerawarana

• Re: Proposed Infoset Addendum to SOAP Messages with Attachments (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Proposed Infoset Addendum to SOAP Messages with Attachments (Friday, 28 March)
• CFP: 1st European Workshop on Object-Oriented Web Services (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: WSDL 1.2 drops use="encoded" (Monday, 3 March)

Scott Cantor

• RE: Are empty strings legal xs:anyURI (Thursday, 27 March)

Last message date: Monday, 31 March 2003 20:57:07 UTC