- From: Herve Ruellan <herve.ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 08:47:30 +0100
- To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- CC: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
I think I would have a more mitagated response: The approach by itself does not allow the equivalent of unreferenced attachments (you may however achieve this by including an attachment in an "unreferenced" SOAP header). However, depending on the method used for carrying the binary, you may include there unreferenced attachments. For exemple, if you are using MIME to carry the binary, nothing precludes adding a MIME part not referenced in the SOAP envelope. Hope this helps, Hervé. Martin Gudgin wrote: > No. > > Gudge > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com] >>Sent: 28 March 2003 04:29 >>To: xml-dist-app@w3.org >> >> >>Hi Gudge, >> >>Does this approach allow the equivalent of unreferenced attachments? >>With SwA one can have attachments that are not referred to >>directly by the SOAP envelope, but are there if one wants to >>get at them. >> >>Thanks, >> >>Sanjiva. >>
Received on Friday, 28 March 2003 02:47:40 UTC