W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > March 2003

RE: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP

From: Anne Thomas Manes <anne@manes.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:29:22 -0500
To: "Don Box" <dbox@microsoft.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <ECEDLFLFGIEENIPIEJJPOEEFDLAA.anne@manes.net>

I certainly prefer the idea of using XInclude better than SwA or
WS-Attachments. But why not just use base64? It's really the better way to
go.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org [mailto:xml-dist-app-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Don Box
> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 1:46 AM
> To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
> Subject: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP
>
>
>
> A few of us have spent some time thinking about the problem space
> and wrote the down our thoughts in this area:
>
> http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/02/26/binaryxml.html
>
> DB
>
>
Received on Friday, 7 March 2003 12:29:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:13 GMT