W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2009

www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from October to December 2009 by date

Saturday, 7 November 2009
- [Bug 6015] [schema11] valid (and its derivations) vs assessment as used in text bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 5156] 3.4.2 XML Representation of Complex Type Definitions bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Friday, 6 November 2009
- [Bug 7695] Conformance bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 6698] Provide both dated and undated schema documents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7695] Conformance bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Tuesday, 3 November 2009
- [Bug 7913] Strange result from definition of governing element declaration bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- Re: [Bug 3027] erroneous date example Kevin Braun
- Re: [Bug 3027] erroneous date example Dave Peterson
Monday, 2 November 2009
- Re: [Bug 3027] erroneous date example Kevin Braun
- Re: [Bug 3027] erroneous date example C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
- [Bug 3027] erroneous date example bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 6015] [schema11] valid (and its derivations) vs assessment as used in text bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 8119] defaultAttributes and complexType extension/restriction don't play nice bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Saturday, 31 October 2009
- [Bug 8119] defaultAttributes and complexType extension/restriction don't play nice bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Friday, 30 October 2009
- [Bug 8119] defaultAttributes and complexType extension/restriction don't play nice bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 3027] erroneous date example bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 6698] Provide both dated and undated schema documents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7913] Strange result from definition of governing element declaration bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 6015] [schema11] valid (and its derivations) vs assessment as used in text bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 5164] validation vs assessment bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Thursday, 29 October 2009
- [Bug 7913] Strange result from definition of governing element declaration bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- Re: [Bug 5164] validation vs assessment noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- [Bug 6015] [schema11] valid (and its derivations) vs assessment as used in text bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 5164] validation vs assessment bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- Extensibility limitation in XML schema Shropshire, Andrew A
Wednesday, 28 October 2009
- [Bug 8119] New: defaultAttributes and complexType extension/restriction don't play nice bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7985] explicitTimezone missing from production for simpleContent restriction bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7985] explicitTimezone missing from production for simpleContent restriction bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Monday, 26 October 2009
- [Bug 6982] Open content allows (but ignores) minOccurs and maxOccurs bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- Re: [Bug 5156] 3.4.2 XML Representation of Complex Type Definitions C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
- [Bug 5156] 3.4.2 XML Representation of Complex Type Definitions bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Friday, 23 October 2009
- [Bug 5507] Symbol spaces need clearer description bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 5159] misleading section names bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 5156] 3.4.2 XML Representation of Complex Type Definitions bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Tuesday, 20 October 2009
- [Bug 7985] explicitTimezone missing from production for simpleContent restriction bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7985] New: explicityTimezone missing from production for simpleContent restriction bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Monday, 19 October 2009
- [Bug 5159] misleading section names bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7787] Description of change to Element Declarations Consistent is confusing bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Friday, 16 October 2009
- [Bug 4452] facet values not displayed correctly bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7818] Statement on wildcard unions misleading. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7796] Misleading statement on change to unions bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7787] Description of change to Element Declarations Consistent is confusing bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7818] Statement on wildcard unions misleading. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7796] Misleading statement on change to unions bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7787] Description of change to Element Declarations Consistent is confusing bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 4452] facet values not displayed correctly bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7913] Strange result from definition of governing element declaration bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7695] Conformance bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 5507] Symbol spaces need clearer description bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 5156] 3.4.2 XML Representation of Complex Type Definitions bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 5159] misleading section names bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Thursday, 15 October 2009
- [Bug 7818] Statement on wildcard unions misleading. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7796] Misleading statement on change to unions bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7787] Description of change to Element Declarations Consistent is confusing bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 3589] Definitions of "schema document" draft proposal for bugs 2822 and 2846 PSVI and processor profiles bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7818] Statement on wildcard unions misleading. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7818] Statement on wildcard unions misleading. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7818] Statement on wildcard unions misleading. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Wednesday, 14 October 2009
- [Bug 7913] Strange result from definition of governing element declaration bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Tuesday, 13 October 2009
- [Bug 7913] New: Strange result from definition of governing element declaration bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Monday, 12 October 2009
- [Bug 5507] Symbol spaces need clearer description bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 6013] [schema11] new examples needed bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Sunday, 11 October 2009
- [Bug 7678] time zones and leap seconds bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 3027] erroneous date example bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Saturday, 10 October 2009
- [Bug 7096] clarifications needed for annotation mapping? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 6013] [schema11] new examples needed bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 6909] is a pre-lexical facet magic? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7758] charGroupPart prose and production mismatch bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7756] Incorrect production for charGroup in regular expression appendix bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7678] time zones and leap seconds bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 6909] is a pre-lexical facet magic? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7242] Type inconsistencies introduced by inheritable attributes bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 6013] [schema11] new examples needed bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 6193] clarify ##defined and ##sibling definitions bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 5436] Editorial: replace 'attributed to' with 'bound to' ? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 5353] Do "path" etc. apply to model groups or particles or content models? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 5345] Split SCC: Derivation Valid (Extension) into 2 parts bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 5237] Use of term "Element Information Item" in Derivation Valid (Restriction, Complex) bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 5192] Terminology: "absent" (editorial) bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 5165] Editorial: numbering of rules and constraints bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 5143] small editorial changes section 3.8.4 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 5075] use of "ad" as an ID vs. ad blockers bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 3970] Assertions: Wording of the actual draft bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 3589] Definitions of "schema document" draft proposal for bugs 2822 and 2846 PSVI and processor profiles bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 6266] correct varying style in References appendix bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 5550] references to fundamental facets bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 4453] inconsistent styles bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 3942] Define datatypes in formal definition? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 3226] Terminology: "character string" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Friday, 9 October 2009
- [Bug 2401] Use new term 'owner' more widely, maybe bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 4452] facet values not displayed correctly bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 6722] Definition of laxly assessed is not clear bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 2783] constituting a restriction bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 2783] constituting a restriction bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 4452] facet values not displayed correctly bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 4452] facet values not displayed correctly bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7758] charGroupPart prose and production mismatch bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7818] Statement on wildcard unions misleading. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7813] defaultOpenContent should not prevent inheriting openContent when using extension bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7796] Misleading statement on change to unions bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7787] Description of change to Element Declarations Consistent is confusing bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7758] charGroupPart prose and production mismatch bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 4452] facet values not displayed correctly bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 4452] facet values not displayed correctly bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 5507] Symbol spaces need clearer description bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 3027] erroneous date example bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 4452] facet values not displayed correctly bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 5507] Symbol spaces need clearer description bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 5507] Symbol spaces need clearer description bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Thursday, 8 October 2009
- [Bug 5507] Symbol spaces need clearer description bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- RE: [Bug 7695] Conformance Michael Kay
- [Bug 5507] Symbol spaces need clearer description bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- Re: [Bug 7695] Conformance noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- Re: [Bug 7695] Conformance Henry S. Thompson
Wednesday, 7 October 2009
- Re: [Bug 7695] Conformance noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- [Bug 7695] Conformance bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- Re: [Bug 7695] Conformance C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
- Re: [Bug 7695] Conformance noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- Re: [Bug 7695] Conformance C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
- [Bug 7695] Conformance bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7695] Conformance bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 3027] erroneous date example bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 3027] erroneous date example bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Tuesday, 6 October 2009
- [Bug 7818] Statement on wildcard unions misleading. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7818] New: Statement on wildcard unions misleading. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Monday, 5 October 2009
- [Bug 7813] New: defaultOpenContent should not prevent inheriting openContent when using extension bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- Re: [Bug 7787] New: Description of change to Element Declarations Consistent is confusing Kevin Braun
- Re: [Bug 7796] New: Misleading statement on change to unions C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
- Re: [Bug 7796] New: Misleading statement on change to unions Kevin Braun
Saturday, 3 October 2009
- RE: [Bug 7796] New: Misleading statement on change to unions Michael Kay
- Re: [Bug 7787] New: Description of change to Element Declarations Consistent is confusing C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
- Re: [Bug 7796] New: Misleading statement on change to unions C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
- Re: [Bug 7758] charGroupPart prose and production mismatch C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
Friday, 2 October 2009
- [Bug 7678] time zones and leap seconds bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7756] Incorrect production for charGroup in regular expression appendix bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7796] New: Misleading statement on change to unions bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7795] New: Default value of "nillable" on (local) element declarations in SD4SD bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 7758] charGroupPart prose and production mismatch bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Thursday, 1 October 2009
- [Bug 7787] New: Description of change to Element Declarations Consistent is confusing bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Last message date: Saturday, 7 November 2009 16:42:22 GMT
Archived on: Saturday, 7 November 2009 16:42:23 GMT