- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:28:45 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5507
--- Comment #5 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> 2009-10-09 00:28:45 ---
Noah's suggestion in comment 4 seems not to handle cases like
<complexType name="upa-demo">
<sequence>
<element name="a"/>
<element name="a" nillable="true" minOccurs="0"/>
</sequence>
</complexType>
It would also seem to entail that the following schema document should give
rise to a legal schema:
<schema xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<element name="a"/>
<element name="a"/>
</schema>
That would be a feasible rule (although it's rather late for such a dramatic
clarification), but all the processors I've tested reject it.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 9 October 2009 00:28:47 UTC