On 7 Oct 2009, at 16:34 , noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: > Michael Sperberg-McQueen writes: > >> Just for the record, this member of the WG never believed any >> distinction was intended. > > Nor did I. In that case, I don't understand your taking the position that the current definition of minimal conformance requires full exposure of the PSVI. Michael -- **************************************************************** * C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, Black Mesa Technologies LLC * http://www.blackmesatech.com * http://cmsmcq.com/mib * http://balisage.net ****************************************************************Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2009 22:38:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:17 GMT