- From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 16:38:17 -0600
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- Cc: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
On 7 Oct 2009, at 16:34 , noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: > Michael Sperberg-McQueen writes: > >> Just for the record, this member of the WG never believed any >> distinction was intended. > > Nor did I. In that case, I don't understand your taking the position that the current definition of minimal conformance requires full exposure of the PSVI. Michael -- **************************************************************** * C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, Black Mesa Technologies LLC * http://www.blackmesatech.com * http://cmsmcq.com/mib * http://balisage.net ****************************************************************
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2009 22:38:50 UTC