W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: [Bug 7695] Conformance

From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 16:38:17 -0600
Cc: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <34378E15-212E-494B-A8C2-4FD6F3A4E04B@blackmesatech.com>
To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

On 7 Oct 2009, at 16:34 , noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:

> Michael Sperberg-McQueen writes:
>
>> Just for the record, this member of the WG never believed any
>> distinction was intended.
>
> Nor did I.

In that case, I don't understand your taking the position
that the current definition of minimal conformance
requires full exposure of the PSVI.

Michael

-- 
****************************************************************
* C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, Black Mesa Technologies LLC
* http://www.blackmesatech.com
* http://cmsmcq.com/mib
* http://balisage.net
****************************************************************
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2009 22:38:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:17 GMT