[Bug 7695] Conformance

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7695





--- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>  2009-10-07 20:44:24 ---
Thanks for this extra input. I had completely overlooked the existence of the
named PSVI subsets defined in C.1. They do indeed shed a new light on the
intent of the WG with regards to the conformance status of a processor that
does not make the full PSVI available to the application (and provide extra
justification for the need to revise section 2.4 to achieve consistency).


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:44:26 UTC