W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2009

[Bug 5143] small editorial changes section 3.8.4

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 01:08:03 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1MwQRH-00008A-N7@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5143


C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
           Keywords|                            |noFurtherAction
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX




--- Comment #1 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>  2009-10-10 01:08:03 ---
In August and September 2009 the XML Schema working group performed
triage on the remaining open issues in a WBS poll [1], whose results
are summarized at [2] and accepted formally at [3]. In the course of
that triage we decided, with some regret, to close this issue without
further action.  We just aren't going to get this done in the time
available to us, and we do not believe the issue is critical enough to
warrant delaying the spec to address it.  

The WG did discuss the possibility of changing the verb 'attribute'
and related terms to use some other root (bind, associate, aver,
ascribe, ...), but we could not find anything that appealed to us
enough to make us want to go through the exercise of explaining that
the constraint formerly known as UPA (Unique Particle Attribution) had
a new name, and so on.

John, as the originator of this issue, I must ask you to signal your
agreement with (or at least, I hope, your acquiescence in) this
disposition of the comment, by closing the issue.  Or, if need be, to
signal your unwilling to accept this disposition, by reopening it and
explaining what it would take to satisfy you.  If we don't hear from
you in two weeks, we'll assume you're willing to live with this
result.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/19482/200908CRissues/
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-wg/2009Sep/0005.html
[3]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2009Sep/att-0005/2009-09-11telcon.html#item04
(all links member-only)


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 10 October 2009 01:08:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:17 GMT