W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2009

[Bug 8458] New: <alternative> not explicitly identified as absent in reference to global element

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:07:29 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-8458-703@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8458

           Summary: <alternative> not explicitly identified as absent in
                    reference to global element
           Product: XML Schema
           Version: 1.1 only
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows 2000
            Status: NEW
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P2
         Component: Structures: XSD Part 1
        AssignedTo: David_E3@VERIFONE.com
        ReportedBy: kbraun@obj-sys.com
         QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
                CC: cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com


In section 3.3.3, step 2.2 reads:
 If ref is present, then all of <complexType>, <simpleType>, <key>, <keyref>,
 <unique>, nillable, default, fixed, form, block and type are absent, i.e. only
 minOccurs, maxOccurs, id and <annotation> are allowed to appear together with
 ref.

It should probably mention <alternative> and read:
 If ref is present, then all of <complexType>, <simpleType>, <alternative>,
 <key>, <keyref>, <unique>, nillable, default, fixed, form, block and type are
 absent, i.e. only minOccurs, maxOccurs, id and <annotation> are allowed to
 appear together with ref.

At least, I think that is the intention.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 8 December 2009 15:07:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 December 2009 15:07:31 GMT