www-archive@w3.org from February 2006 by author

Anne van Kesteren

• whitespace normalization (was: Re: SVGT 1.2: A proposal for how to define SVG whitespace in terms of CSS whitespace) (Wednesday, 1 February)

Arthur Ryman

• Demo of Apache Woden for WSD WG F2F, Cannes, 2006-02-28 (Monday, 27 February)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: The xhtml:onkeypress architecture (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: whitespace normalization (was: Re: SVGT 1.2: A proposal for how to define SVG whitespace in terms of CSS whitespace) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Comments on URIs for W3C Namespaces (Wednesday, 1 February)

Daigo Matsubara

• test (Wednesday, 8 February)

Dan Connolly

• use of cite [was: fun with embedded RDF] (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Jape, sequents, and judgements (Tuesday, 28 February)
• how to give the foaf:maker of this page? [was: fun with embedded RDF] (Saturday, 25 February)
• re dates in SPARQL (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: fun with embedded RDF (Thursday, 23 February)
• fun with embedded RDF (Thursday, 23 February)
• mvc vs partial understanding (Sunday, 19 February)
• draft SPARQL CR transition request (Saturday, 11 February)
• an episode of MadScientistMode: Ubuntu, Launchpad, bzr, trac, hg, ... (Thursday, 9 February)
• an episode of MadScientistMode: Ubuntu, Launchpad, bzr, trac, hg, ... Submitted by connolly on Thu, 2006-02-02 14:47. :: I went into MadScientistMode <http://esw.w3.org/topic/MadScientistMode> Tuesday night. (my notes say 2006-02-01; it was after midnight when I dated them, i guess). Internal discussion of Amaya reminded me... F2 doesn't work on my debian machine due to funky USB keyboard... would it work on Ubuntu? Ubuntu's support thingy, part of Launchpad, looks nice; separates problem reporting from bug tracking, like back at Convex. I surfed around the source code management (delicious scm@@) and issue tracking (delicious @@quality) space for a while... what's new in mercurial/hg? ah.. 0.8 release. hg update.. works nice. (can't remember any new features). What about bzr? Nice outreach/marketing on the web site... and nice design survey docs. But nothing as interesting as hg's revlog. I don't see it scaling to kernel development any time soon. could hg scale up to the size of W3C's CVS (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: unit tests for 2006/02swap/euler.js please? (Tuesday, 7 February)
• unit tests for 2006/02swap/euler.js please? (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: GRDDL service goofs up namespaces of TP hCalendar? (Thursday, 2 February)
• GRDDL service goofs up namespaces of TP hCalendar? (Thursday, 2 February)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

• Re: GRDDL service goofs up namespaces of TP hCalendar? (Thursday, 2 February)

Ian B. Jacobs

• Re: Comments on URIs for W3C Namespaces (Wednesday, 1 February)

Ian Davis

• Re: fun with embedded RDF (Thursday, 23 February)

jos.deroo@agfa.com

• Re: unit tests for 2006/02swap/euler.js please? (Wednesday, 8 February)

Karl Dubost

• Re: use of cite [was: fun with embedded RDF] (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: fun with embedded RDF (Tuesday, 28 February)

Paul Pierce

• "BX Proposal" (Tuesday, 7 February)

WBS Mailer on behalf of

• [wbs] response to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion' (Sunday, 26 February)
• [wbs] response to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion' (Saturday, 25 February)
• [wbs] response to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion' (Saturday, 25 February)
• [wbs] response to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion' (Saturday, 25 February)
• [wbs] response to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion' (Thursday, 23 February)
• [wbs] response to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion' (Thursday, 23 February)
• [wbs] response to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion' (Monday, 20 February)
• [wbs] response to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion' (Thursday, 16 February)
• [wbs] response to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion' (Thursday, 16 February)
• [wbs] response to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion' (Wednesday, 15 February)
• [wbs] response to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion' (Wednesday, 15 February)
• [wbs] response to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion' (Wednesday, 15 February)
• [wbs] response to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion' (Tuesday, 14 February)
• [wbs] response to 'Next Steps for the RDF Data Access Working Group' (Tuesday, 14 February)
• [wbs] response to 'Next Steps for the RDF Data Access Working Group' (Tuesday, 14 February)
• [wbs] response to 'GRDDL charter input, meeting at Tech Plenary' (Saturday, 11 February)

Last message date: Tuesday, 28 February 2006 16:22:50 UTC