W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > February 2006

[wbs] response to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion'

From: WBS Mailer on behalf of <webmaster@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:25:01 +0000
To: greg@evilfunhouse.com,www-archive@w3.org
Message-Id: <wbs-14e6565020efb3d485151a5d36265cbf@cgi.w3.org>


Here are the answers submitted to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion' (the
public) for Gregory Williams.



---------------------------------
Other Issues
----
What additional issues/missing features should factor into rechartering
discussions?

feature 1: 
feature 2: 
feature 3: 




---------------------------------
Priorities
----
What issues/features are most important to you?

Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): 
A protocol for update/insert is the most important feature, followed by
syntax for accessing collections (which is all but avoided now due to
difficulty in querying) and subqueries.

The bnodeRef issue might be important, but I believe most of my personal
use cases for it would be better solved by a combination of insert/update
support and subqueries.




---------------------------------
Attend F2F
----
Will you attend the DAWG face to face at the 2006 TP? (See also, the
Registration for Technical Plenary.)

[ No ] 




---------------------------------
Demos
----
What SPARQL demos would you like to show at the meeting?

Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): 



These answers were last modified on 14 February 2006 at 22:22:42 U.T.C.
by Gregory Williams

Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/DAWGnextSteps/ until 2006-03-01.

 Regards,

 The Automatic WBS Mailer
Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2006 22:25:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:54 GMT