W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > February 2006

[wbs] response to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion'

From: WBS Mailer on behalf of <webmaster@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:47:01 +0000
To: www-archive@w3.org
Message-Id: <wbs-c1cd3372b17e4f3dd2f331e6047a7af8@cgi.w3.org>


Here are the answers submitted to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion' (the
public) for Mark Baker.



---------------------------------
Other Issues
----
What additional issues/missing features should factor into rechartering
discussions?

feature 1: forms language
feature 2: 
feature 3: 




---------------------------------
Priorities
----
What issues/features are most important to you?

Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): 
The ability to use SPARQL via forms languages such as HTML or XForms. 
Ideally, a forms language for RDF should be developed too.

I thought there was an issue about this with the WG based on a comment of
mine[1], but I guess not.

 [1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2004Jun/0007.html




---------------------------------
Attend F2F
----
Will you attend the DAWG face to face at the 2006 TP? (See also, the
Registration for Technical Plenary.)

[ No ] 




---------------------------------
Demos
----
What SPARQL demos would you like to show at the meeting?

Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): 



These answers were last modified on 15 February 2006 at 17:40:57 U.T.C.
by Mark Baker

Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/DAWGnextSteps/ until 2006-03-01.

 Regards,

 The Automatic WBS Mailer
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2006 17:47:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:54 GMT