- From: WBS Mailer on behalf of <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:32:01 +0000
- To: www-archive@w3.org
Here are the answers submitted to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion' (the public) for Bijan Parsia. --------------------------------- Other Issues ---- What additional issues/missing features should factor into rechartering discussions? feature 1: Federated query feature 2: sessions feature 3: --------------------------------- Priorities ---- What issues/features are most important to you? Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): owlDisjunction is very important, as one might imagine. I think it would be good to standardize that area as there is a lively implementation set, so, little research. bndoeRef, update, cascadedQueries, SESSIONS!!!!/transactions, xmlAbstractSyntax --------------------------------- Attend F2F ---- Will you attend the DAWG face to face at the 2006 TP? (See also, the Registration for Technical Plenary.) [ No ] --------------------------------- Demos ---- What SPARQL demos would you like to show at the meeting? Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): These answers were last modified on 25 February 2006 at 17:28:02 U.T.C. by Bijan Parsia Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/DAWGnextSteps/ until 2006-03-01. Regards, The Automatic WBS Mailer
Received on Saturday, 25 February 2006 17:32:06 UTC