W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > February 2006

[wbs] response to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion'

From: WBS Mailer on behalf of <webmaster@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:32:01 +0000
To: www-archive@w3.org
Message-Id: <wbs-7760ec4aa2c633cdbde53a30caa85bc8@cgi.w3.org>

Here are the answers submitted to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion' (the
public) for Bijan Parsia.

Other Issues
What additional issues/missing features should factor into rechartering

feature 1: Federated query
feature 2: sessions
feature 3: 

What issues/features are most important to you?

Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): 
owlDisjunction is very important, as one might imagine. I think it would
be good to standardize that area as there is a lively implementation set,
so, little research.

bndoeRef, update, cascadedQueries, SESSIONS!!!!/transactions,

Attend F2F
Will you attend the DAWG face to face at the 2006 TP? (See also, the
Registration for Technical Plenary.)

[ No ] 

What SPARQL demos would you like to show at the meeting?

Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): 

These answers were last modified on 25 February 2006 at 17:28:02 U.T.C.
by Bijan Parsia

Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/DAWGnextSteps/ until 2006-03-01.


 The Automatic WBS Mailer
Received on Saturday, 25 February 2006 17:32:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:42:56 UTC