[wbs] response to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion'

Here are the answers submitted to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion' (the
public) for Bijan Parsia.



---------------------------------
Other Issues
----
What additional issues/missing features should factor into rechartering
discussions?

feature 1: Federated query
feature 2: sessions
feature 3: 




---------------------------------
Priorities
----
What issues/features are most important to you?

Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): 
owlDisjunction is very important, as one might imagine. I think it would
be good to standardize that area as there is a lively implementation set,
so, little research.

bndoeRef, update, cascadedQueries, SESSIONS!!!!/transactions,
xmlAbstractSyntax




---------------------------------
Attend F2F
----
Will you attend the DAWG face to face at the 2006 TP? (See also, the
Registration for Technical Plenary.)

[ No ] 




---------------------------------
Demos
----
What SPARQL demos would you like to show at the meeting?

Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): 



These answers were last modified on 25 February 2006 at 17:28:02 U.T.C.
by Bijan Parsia

Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/DAWGnextSteps/ until 2006-03-01.

 Regards,

 The Automatic WBS Mailer