public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org from September 2004 by author

Amelia A Lewis

• Re: XMLP Review of WSDL 2.0 Part 2 LC WD (Monday, 27 September)

Arthur Ryman

• Rename <definitions> to <description> (Thursday, 16 September)

Asir Vedamuthu

• RE: Mapping ref attribute to {fault reference} - Type Mismatch (Tuesday, 28 September)
• RE: Interface = design of the application ?? (Tuesday, 28 September)
• RE: HTTP Operation Component ? (Tuesday, 28 September)
• RE: "whttp:location" attribute is missing (Tuesday, 28 September)
• RE: Editorial: Issue 177 Implementation (Tuesday, 28 September)

Bob Cunnings

• Re: binding/operation/infault|outfault? (Thursday, 9 September)
• binding/operation/infault|outfault? (Tuesday, 7 September)

David Booth

• Message Exchange Patterns -- p2c and/or p2e (Tuesday, 28 September)
• Clarify whether Parts 2 & 3 MUST be supported (Tuesday, 28 September)
• RE: Permit URI References instead of URIs (Tuesday, 21 September)
• typo (Wednesday, 15 September)

David Orchard

• WSDL Last Call issue (Wednesday, 29 September)

Dominique Hazaël-Massieux

• RE: QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance issues (Wednesday, 22 September)
• RE: QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, Technical comments (Wednesday, 22 September)
• RE: QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance issues (Friday, 3 September)

Frank Ellermann

• WD-wsdl20-bindings-20040803 (Saturday, 7 August)

Hugo Haas

• Optional predefined features in Part 2 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• Part 3 section 3.6.2: {http location} not necessarily a template (Monday, 20 September)
• Part 3 editorial comment: 3.8.1 not written in terms of component model (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: FW:LC11 [was LC10: element names for defaults] (Wednesday, 15 September)
• Part 2 editorial comment (Tuesday, 14 September)
• Part 1: DTD as the schema language for WSDL (Tuesday, 14 September)
• Part 3 3.6.4 Mapping Between HTTP Operation's XML Representation to Component Properties and default values (Tuesday, 14 September)
• Part 3 organization: wsdls:* versus xs:* (Tuesday, 14 September)
• Part 1 editorial comments (Tuesday, 14 September)
• Completing Part 1 Appendix C: URI References for WSDL constructs (Tuesday, 14 September)
• Part 3 SOAP Binding: default HTTP method (Tuesday, 14 September)
• Part 3 examples 3-1, 3-2 and 3-3 errors (Tuesday, 14 September)
• WSDL conformance & XML Schema conformance (Tuesday, 14 September)
• [nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de: WD-wsdl20-bindings-20040803] (Monday, 6 September)

Jacek Kopecky

• Last call review comments (Wednesday, 29 September)
• Editorial last call review comments (Wednesday, 29 September)

Jonathan Marsh

• RE: QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, Technical comments (Thursday, 30 September)
• RE: binding/operation/infault|outfault? (Thursday, 30 September)
• RE: Rename <definitions> to <description> (Wednesday, 29 September)
• FW: error in part 2, section 3.1.4 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• FW: Clarification for use of xs:include (Wednesday, 29 September)
• RE: Part 1: DTD as the schema language for WSDL (Wednesday, 29 September)
• RE: Part 3 3.6.4 Mapping Between HTTP Operation's XML Representation to Component Properties and default values (Wednesday, 29 September)
• RE: Part 3 organization: wsdls:* versus xs:* (Wednesday, 29 September)
• RE: WSDL conformance & XML Schema conformance (Wednesday, 29 September)
• RE: WD-wsdl20-bindings-20040803 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• RE: Mapping ref attribute to {fault reference} - Type Mismatch (Tuesday, 21 September)
• RE: Interface = design of the application ?? (Tuesday, 21 September)
• RE: HTTP Operation Component ? (Tuesday, 21 September)
• RE: "whttp:location" attribute is missing (Tuesday, 21 September)
• RE: Permit URI References instead of URIs (Tuesday, 21 September)
• RE: QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, Technical comments (Tuesday, 21 September)
• RE: QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance issues (Tuesday, 21 September)
• RE: Completing Part 1 Appendix C: URI References for WSDL constructs (Tuesday, 21 September)
• RE: Part 3 SOAP Binding: default HTTP method (Tuesday, 21 September)
• FW:LC11 [was LC10: element names for defaults] (Thursday, 9 September)
• RE: QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance issues (Thursday, 2 September)
• RE: Editorial for Part 1 section 2.18 (Thursday, 2 September)
• RE: Editorial for Part 1 section 2.18 (Thursday, 2 September)
• RE: Editorial: Issue 177 Implementation (Thursday, 2 September)
• RE: Requiredness (two issues) (Wednesday, 1 September)

Liu, Kevin

• typo in part 3, section 2.7.2 (Thursday, 30 September)
• typo in part 3 section 2.1 (Thursday, 30 September)
• Clarificatioin for binding fault (Thursday, 30 September)
• RE: error in part 2, section 3.1.4 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• RE: Clarification for use of xs:include (Wednesday, 29 September)

Marc Hadley

• Fwd: Review of WSDL 2.0 Pt 3 Last Call WD (Thursday, 9 September)

michael.mahan@nokia.com

• Re: XMLP Review of WSDL 2.0 Part 2 LC WD (Tuesday, 28 September)
• XMLP Review of WSDL 2.0 Part 2 LC WD (Monday, 27 September)

Roberto Chinnici

• Re: binding/operation/infault|outfault? (Tuesday, 7 September)

Sanjiva Weerawarana

• use of provider agent & requestor agent terms in the spec (Tuesday, 14 September)

Last message date: Thursday, 30 September 2004 23:34:31 UTC