- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:38:56 -0700
- To: "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>, <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
For the record, the editors fixed this issue in the latest editors draft [1] and the WG closed the related issue [2]. We will assume you agree that we have addressed the issue appropriately unless we hear from you before Oct 13th. [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-bindings. html [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC36 > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc- > comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Hugo Haas > Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 9:15 AM > To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > Subject: Part 3 organization: wsdls:* versus xs:* > > The following is editorial. > > Part 1 does a good job of presenting properties and their types in the > Relationship to WSDL Component Model section, and an XML 1.0 > serialization using XML Schema types in the XML Representation > section. > > This isn't the case of Part 3, which uses wsdls:* in the XML > Representation section, and uses xs:* in the pseudo-schema only. This > needs to be fixed by: > - adding wsdls:* types in the Relationship to WSDL Component Model > section. > - changing wsdls:* by xs:* in the XML Representation section. > > Regards, > > Hugo > > -- > Hugo Haas - W3C > mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2004 19:39:32 UTC