RE: Interface = design of the application ??

Thank you for considering our request.

Asir

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Marsh [mailto:jmarsh@microsoft.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 2:22 PM
To: Asir Vedamuthu; public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
Cc: Christopher St. John
Subject: RE: Interface = design of the application ??


Thanks for your comment.  The Working Group decided to drop this
sentence as you suggest.

[See http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC16]

If you don't respond by October 1, we'll assume you accept this
resolution.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu
> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 6:36 PM
> To: 'public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org'
> Cc: Christopher St. John
> Subject: Interface = design of the application ??
> 
> 
> I am writing this issue on behalf of Christopher St. John, webMethods.
> 
> ref: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-20040803/#Interface_details
> 
> "2.2.1 The Interface Component
> 
> An Interface component describes sequences of messages that a service
> sends
> and/or receives. It does this by grouping related messages into
> operations.
> An operation is a sequence of input and output messages, and an
interface
> is
> a set of operations. Thus, an interface defines the design of the
> application."
> 
> This paragraph defines the design of the application. It appears that
this
> para is moving too fast. It provides some evidence. But, its
conclusion -
> "Thus, .."  - does not carry sufficient evidence. Then again, WSDL
does
> not
> have to say anything about the design of the application. Perhaps, the
> design of an interface. We suggest getting rid of the last sentence.
> 
> Regards,
> Asir S Vedamuthu
> asirv at webmethods dot com
> http://www.webmethods.com/

Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2004 19:32:20 UTC