public-rdf-wg@w3.org from June 2013 by author

Andy Seaborne

• Re: N-Quads test suite (ACTION-275) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: agenda 26 June telecon (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? (Saturday, 22 June)
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? (Saturday, 22 June)
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? (Thursday, 20 June)
• Minutes of the telecon of 2013-06-19 (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: /2013/TurtleTests/ (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-06-11 (Sunday, 16 June)
• TriG -- trailing DOT in {} blocks. (Saturday, 15 June)
• /2013/TurtleTests/ (Saturday, 15 June)
• Re: TriG test suite (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: graph names denoting the graph (suggested change to Concepts) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: graph names denoting the graph (suggested change to Concepts) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: schema.org post about JSON-LD (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Minutes of the telecon of 2013-June-05 (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: dataset stuff as an extension or optional feature (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131) (Saturday, 1 June)

Antoine Zimmermann

• Re: Regrets for 26 June Telecon (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: agenda 26 June telecon (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: agenda for Wednesday 26 June? (Tuesday, 25 June)
• union of graphs [soolved with a minor issue] (Tuesday, 25 June)
• D-entailment [solved] (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: entailment on sets of RDF graphs (union vs merge semantics) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: datatypes (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: datatypes (Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013)) (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: union (Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013)) with an addition (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: Agenda for 12 June 2013 (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Regrets for today's telecon (Wednesday, 5 June)

Arnaud Le Hors

• Re: agenda 26 June telecon (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Examples in TriG spec don't display (Wednesday, 5 June)
• RE: dataset stuff as an extension or optional feature (Wednesday, 5 June)

Dan Brickley

• Re: schema.org post about JSON-LD (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: schema.org post about JSON-LD (Wednesday, 5 June)
• schema.org post about JSON-LD (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: Resolutions for features at risk [JSON-LD] (Monday, 3 June)

David Wood

• Re: ACTION-274 is not done (Friday, 28 June)
• Adding Extended RDF Graphs and Datasets to Concepts (Thursday, 27 June)
• Regrets for 26 June Telecon (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: agenda for Wednesday 26 June? (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Managing Public Comments to the RDF WG (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: comments / review of Concepts (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Managing Public Comments to the RDF WG (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: JSON-LD and its relationship to RDF (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: JSON-LD and its relationship to RDF (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: Agenda for 12 June 2013 (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Agenda for 12 June 2013 (Monday, 10 June)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: changes to TurtleTests since inception (Thursday, 27 June)
• changes to TurtleTests since inception (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? (Sunday, 23 June)
• Re: Promoting rdf-mt (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: Promoting rdf-mt (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: /2013/TurtleTests/ (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: /2013/TurtleTests/ (Wednesday, 19 June)

Gavin Carothers

• Future Test Suite release process (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: comments / review of Concepts (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: TriG -- trailing DOT in {} blocks. (Saturday, 15 June)
• Re: Status N-Triples / N-Quads (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: Examples in TriG spec don't display (Wednesday, 5 June)

Gregg Kellogg

• N-Quads test suite (ACTION-275) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: changes to TurtleTests since inception (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: Future Test Suite release process (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: comments on JSON-LD 1.0, A JSON-based Serialization for Linked Data (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: TriG -- trailing DOT in {} blocks. (Saturday, 15 June)
• Re: TriG -- trailing DOT in {} blocks. (Saturday, 15 June)
• Re: TriG test suite (Friday, 14 June)
• TriG test suite (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, June 11th 2013 (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: dataset stuff as an extension or optional feature (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: Bound and Unbound Datasets (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: Resolutions for features at risk [JSON-LD] (Sunday, 2 June)
• Re: Resolutions for features at risk [JSON-LD] (Sunday, 2 June)
• Re: Resolutions for features at risk [JSON-LD] (Saturday, 1 June)

Guus Schreiber

• Re: Future Test Suite release process (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: agenda 26 June telecon (Wednesday, 26 June)
• chairs meeting? (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: agenda for Wednesday 26 June? (Tuesday, 25 June)
• agenda 26 June telecon (Tuesday, 25 June)
• agenda 19 Jun telecon; proposed duration: 90 minutes (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Status N-Triples / N-Quads (Wednesday, 5 June)
• agenda 5 June telecon (Wednesday, 5 June)

Ivan Herman

• Re: minor changes to Semantics (Sunday, 9 June)
• Re: minor changes to Semantics (Sunday, 9 June)
• Re: schema.org post about JSON-LD (Tuesday, 4 June)

Ivan Mikhailov

• TriG is about semicolons and dots, delimited by occasional RDF data. (Wednesday, 19 June)

Kingsley Idehen

• Re: comments on JSON-LD 1.0, A JSON-based Serialization for Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: relationship between JSON-LD and RDF (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: schema.org post about JSON-LD (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: schema.org post about JSON-LD (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: Property Graphs as (bound) RDF Datasets (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: schema.org post about JSON-LD (Wednesday, 5 June)

Manu Sporny

• Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model (Sunday, 30 June)
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-06-25 (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, June 25th 2013 (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: comments on JSON-LD 1.0, A JSON-based Serialization for Linked Data (Monday, 24 June)
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-06-18 (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: comments on JSON-LD 1.0, A JSON-based Serialization for Linked Data (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, June 18th 2013 (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: Ending the Linked Data debate -- PLEASE VOTE *NOW*! (Thursday, 13 June)
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-06-11 (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, June 11th 2013 (Monday, 10 June)
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-06-04 (Thursday, 6 June)
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, June 4th 2013 (Sunday, 2 June)

Markus Lanthaler

• Minutes of the telecon of 2013-06-26 (Wednesday, 26 June)
• RE: comments / review of Concepts (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: datasets mean their default graphs? (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: datasets mean their default graphs? (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: datasets mean their default graphs? (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: relationship between JSON-LD and RDF (Monday, 17 June)
• RE: RDF-ISSUE-136 (indicating-dataset-semantics): How can one indicate which semantics are intended for a Dataset? [RDF Concepts] (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Intent to close ISSUE-253 / was: Treat reverse term definitions more like regular definitions (ISSUE-253) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Treat reverse term definitions more like regular definitions (ISSUE-253) (Sunday, 9 June)
• RE: minimal dataset semantics (Saturday, 8 June)
• RE: graph names denoting the graph (suggested change to Concepts) (Thursday, 6 June)
• RE: dataset stuff as an extension or optional feature (Tuesday, 4 June)
• RE: Resolutions for features at risk [JSON-LD] (Monday, 3 June)
• RE: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131) (Monday, 3 June)
• RE: Resolutions for features at risk [JSON-LD] (Sunday, 2 June)
• RE: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, June 4th 2013 (Sunday, 2 June)
• RE: Resolutions for features at risk [JSON-LD] (Saturday, 1 June)
• RE: Resolutions for features at risk [JSON-LD] (Saturday, 1 June)

Pat Hayes

• Re: editorial change (Sunday, 30 June)
• editorial change (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: changes to RDF Semantics (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: agenda for Wednesday 26 June? (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: agenda for Wednesday 26 June? (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: union of graphs [soolved with a minor issue] (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? (Saturday, 22 June)
• Re: Promoting rdf-mt (Saturday, 22 June)
• Re: Promoting rdf-mt (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: comments / review of Concepts (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: entailment on sets of RDF graphs (union vs merge semantics) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: comments / review of Concepts (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: entailment on sets of RDF graphs (union vs merge semantics) (Thursday, 20 June)
• datasets mean their default graphs? (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: entailment on sets of RDF graphs (union vs merge semantics) (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: entailments from sets of graphs (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: union (Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013)) with an addition (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: entailment on sets of RDF graphs (union vs merge semantics) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: union (Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013)) with an addition (Wednesday, 19 June)
• semantics new edit (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: editing woes (Monday, 17 June)
• editing woes (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: relationship between JSON-LD and RDF (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: datatypes (Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013)) (Sunday, 16 June)
• Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013) (Saturday, 15 June)
• Re: datatypes without datatype maps (Saturday, 15 June)
• Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013) (Saturday, 15 June)
• Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: minor changes to Semantics (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: minor changes to Semantics (Sunday, 9 June)
• Re: graph names denoting the graph (suggested change to Concepts) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: graph names denoting the graph (suggested change to Concepts) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: Bound and Unbound Datasets (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: Bound and Unbound Datasets (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131) (Sunday, 2 June)
• Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131) (Sunday, 2 June)
• Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131) (Saturday, 1 June)
• Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131) (Saturday, 1 June)
• Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (Saturday, 1 June)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: changes to RDF Semantics (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: Adding Extended RDF Graphs and Datasets to Concepts (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: changes to RDF Semantics (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: agenda 26 June telecon (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: comments on JSON-LD 1.0, A JSON-based Serialization for Linked Data (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: Managing Public Comments to the RDF WG (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: comments / review of Concepts (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: entailment on sets of RDF graphs (union vs merge semantics) (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: entailment on sets of RDF graphs (union vs merge semantics) (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: comments on JSON-LD 1.0, A JSON-based Serialization for Linked Data (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: datatypes (Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013)) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: union (Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013)) with an addition (Wednesday, 19 June)
• a proposal for this week - bridging the gap between JSON-LD and RDF (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: comments on JSON-LD 1.0, A JSON-based Serialization for Linked Data (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: comments on JSON-LD 1.0, A JSON-based Serialization for Linked Data (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: comments on JSON-LD 1.0, A JSON-based Serialization for Linked Data (Tuesday, 18 June)
• relationship between JSON-LD and RDF (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: union (Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013)) with an addition (Saturday, 15 June)
• union (Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013)) (Saturday, 15 June)
• datatypes (Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013)) (Saturday, 15 June)
• Re: [RDF-CONCEPTS] Skolemization (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: JSON-LD and its relationship to RDF (Thursday, 13 June)
• JSON-LD and its relationship to RDF (Thursday, 13 June)
• rdf semantics first? PWD (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: minor changes to Semantics (Monday, 10 June)
• minor changes to Semantics (Sunday, 9 June)
• Re: Property Graphs as (bound) RDF Datasets (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: schema.org post about JSON-LD (Wednesday, 5 June)

Peter Patel-Schneider

• Re: editorial change (Thursday, 27 June)
• changes to RDF Semantics (Wednesday, 26 June)
• ACTION-274 is not done (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: agenda 26 June telecon (Tuesday, 25 June)
• agenda for Wednesday 26 June? (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, June 25th 2013 (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? (Saturday, 22 June)
• Re: comments / review of Concepts (Friday, 21 June)
• entailment on sets of RDF graphs (union vs merge semantics) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• entailments from sets of graphs (Wednesday, 19 June)
• comments on JSON-LD 1.0, A JSON-based Serialization for Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
• datatypes without datatype maps (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• graph names denoting the graph (suggested change to Concepts) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• ISSUE-112 is moot, according to Mark Baker (Wednesday, 5 June)

RDF Working Group Issue Tracker

• RDF-ISSUE-136 (indicating-dataset-semantics): How can one indicate which semantics are intended for a Dataset? [RDF Concepts] (Tuesday, 11 June)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: Adding Extended RDF Graphs and Datasets to Concepts (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: agenda for Wednesday 26 June? (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? (Saturday, 22 June)
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? (Saturday, 22 June)
• Promoting rdf-mt (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: rdf semantics first? PWD (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: Agenda for 12 June 2013 (Monday, 10 June)
• minimal dataset semantics (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: graph names denoting the graph (suggested change to Concepts) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: graph names denoting the graph (suggested change to Concepts) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Property Graphs as (bound) RDF Datasets (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: schema.org post about JSON-LD (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: Bound and Unbound Datasets (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: dataset stuff as an extension or optional feature (Tuesday, 4 June)
• dataset stuff as an extension or optional feature (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: Bound and Unbound Datasets (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: Bound and Unbound Datasets (Monday, 3 June)
• Bound and Unbound Datasets (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131) (Saturday, 1 June)
• Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131) (Saturday, 1 June)
• Re: Resolutions for features at risk [JSON-LD] (Saturday, 1 June)

Souripriya Das

• Regrets for today (Wednesday, 5 June)

William Waites

• Re: Bound and Unbound Datasets (Wednesday, 5 June)

Last message date: Sunday, 30 June 2013 18:18:29 UTC